Esimerkiksi Scapeshift dekit ihan competitive-playssä menny yli ton maagisen 60 lapun - 66 korttia.
Niin mitä että? Nyt kaipaan linkkiä johonkin, missä joku on oikeasti pärjännyt tällaisella.
Ben Rubin tuli toiseksi 64 kortin Abzan Blue:lla GP Oaklandissa tämän vuoden alussa.
Lähestyy off-topiccia jo hurjaa vauhtia, mutta
lainaus:
And they still want to know: Why 64?
But isn’t it obvious?
I’ve got 16 fetchlands, and I’m pretty mana hungry (Tasigur and Warden are technically insatiable), so I certainly don’t want to skimp on fetchables. Specifically, I’ve got 10 targets I certainly want available, even though most of them make for poor draws off the top of the deck. But Shambling Vents are still calling my name from the bench, and a Llanowar Wastes is urging me to give him a chance to play a turn-1 Warden when I don’t have (or want to use) one of my fetchlands to get a Forest. I wanted 27 lands in my intial 60, so with only one spot available and 3 cards to add which are better than the average land in my deck (not as good as Windswept Heath, but much better than the Battlelands in the average case), I have to ask one question:
Do I have any good spells to add?
As it happens, a third Den Protector and fourth Stubborn Denial sounded like fine additions, only marginally worse than the average card in my deck (believe it or not, my only standout is Warden of the First Tree). There is an extra cost in that my sideboard bullets lose efficacy (most important against Red and Abzan), but I still felt that diluting my Battlelands was worth it (they are not nearly as good in this deck as they are in Dark Jeskai).
Was 64 a huge a benefit? No.
Was I ever over 64 during testing? Oh yes.
Do I think it was right? Probably.
Lyhyesti,
tässä tapauksessa 64 korttiin meneminen ei huonontanut keskimääräistä nostoa, mikä on tärkeämpi mittari kuin todennäköisyys nostaa tietty yksittäinen kortti; ainakin nykyisen stanu-Abzanin kaltaisessa goodstuff-deckissä. Nyrkkisääntö kuitenkin on, että mainissa 60 korttia, sidellä 15. Syitä mennä yli ei juuri ole. (ja tähän joku vastaa
Battle of wits)