Esimerkkinä kävi näin: http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?multiverseid=213732 (en osannut tehdä hienoa linkkiä missä näkyisi nimi suoraan, mutta kortti on Fangren Marauder) on tiskissä ja sitten menee pari factiä päreiks. Vastustaja sanoo ok ja sitten tulee hänen kaverinsa ja sanoo "Muista ottaa kymmenen lifeä". No sitten vastustaja sanoo, että "Otan kymmenen lifeä". Sitten olen hyvin hämmentynyt tilanteesta, että mites se homma nyt sitten meneekään?
Huomauttaja oli turnauksessa mukana ja kysymyksessä oli normaali FMN turnaus ja se kaveri siis huomautti asiasta ennenkuin oli ehditty siirtymään seuraavaan steppiin.
Koska kyseessä oli FNM-turnaus ja REL on siis regular, niin tuomarin olisi pitänyt huomauttaa pelaajaa.
Lainaus judging at regular rel
General Unwanted Behaviours -
There will sometimes be issues that do not have official fixes, but need to be discouraged. These include, but
are not limited to;
● Players taking unreasonable amounts of time side-boarding or making play decisions
● Inadequate shuffling after a search
● Asking for, or providing, strategy advice during a tournament match or booster draft
In all of these cases, educate the player on better behaviour for example, alternate shuffling techniques or the
importance of allowing players to make their own decisions. Players continuing to exhibit specific unwanted
behaviour after being instructed otherwise should be issued with a Game Loss.
Players arriving late to their game deserve a special mention, as players more than ten minutes late are
considered to have forfeited their match. Also deserving special mention are players engaging in conduct that
you feel is likely to upset, offend or affect the safety of others e.g. using foul language or tearing up cards.
Give these players a stern chat about what is expected in your event/store and let them know that failure to
curb this behaviour is considered a Serious Problem and will result in their disqualification.
Korkeammalla rel-tasolla olisi kyse ollut ulkopuolisesta avusta ja tuloksena match loss.
4.2. Tournament Error Outside Assistance
Definition
A player, spectator, or other tournament participant does any of the following:
Seeks play advice or hidden information about his or her match from others once he or she has sat for his or
her match.
Gives play advice or reveals hidden information to players who have sat for their match.
During a game, references notes made before the official beginning of the current match, including Oracle
text that has not been provided by a judge.
These criteria also apply to any deck construction and draft portions of a limited tournament. Additionally, no notes
of any kind may be made during a draft. Some team formats have additional communication rules that may modify
the definition of this infraction.
Notes made outside the current match may only be referenced between games, and must have been in the players
possession since the beginning of the match.
Examples
A. During a game, a player references play notes that were created before the tournament.
B. A spectator points out the correct play to the player, who had not solicited the information.
Philosophy
Tournaments test the skill of a player, not their ability to follow external advice or directions. Any strategy advice,
play advice, or construction advice from an external source is considered assistance.
Visual modifications to cards, including brief text, that provide minor strategic information or hints are acceptable
and not considered notes. Detailed instructions or complex strategic advice may not be written on cards. The Head
Judge is the final arbiter on what cards and notes are acceptable for a tournament. Spectators who commit this
infraction may be asked to leave the venue if they are not enrolled in the tournament.